Legal Opinion
Stone v. Neeley
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to the district court for Buffalo county. Tried below before Hamer, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
This case cannot be reviewed for the reason that the record contains no final judgment. A verdict was returned for the defendant in error, assessing her damages at $708.75. A motion for a new trial was filed by the plaintiff in error. The journal entry is as follows:
“Now on this 17th day of October, 1889, this cause coming on to be heard, the defendant George W. Stone’s motion for a new trial was overruled, to which ruling the defendant George W. Stone excepts, and has forty days to prepare a bill of exceptions. It is ordered that judgment be rendered on the verdict for plaintiff.”
This is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miller v. B. & M. R. R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hoffman v. Reinke Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Seven Valleys Bank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Denslow v. DodendorfNebraska Supreme Court · 1896