Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Carrington

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 19, 1894PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Mississippi Circuit Court. — Hon. H. C. O’Bbyan, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Peb curiam.

(Black, C. J., Brace and Macearlane, JJ.) — The statement is made by plaintiffs in error that this suit is m equity to cancel and set aside certain deeds as casting a cloud upon plaintiffs’ title to certain real estate described in the petition. An abstract of the pleadings is not made, nor is a description of the land affected, given. It does not appear from the statement that any motion for a new trial was made and overruled in the circuit court. Indeed nothing has been filed which purports to contain an abstract of the record. A mere statement, giving an abstract of the evidence…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. NaselloSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. State v. CopelandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. Jordan v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Whitehead v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API