Robbins v. Vandermeiden
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Garnishment proceedings by Nathaniel Robbins against Henry J. W. Campman in which the Grand Haven Cement Company was interpleaded, to establish its claim to the fund or indebtedness which was shown by the disclosure. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant garnishee brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.
Plaintiff obtained a judgment by default in November, 1911, against the defendant Vandermeiden, for $463.17. In June, 1912, he caused a writ of garnishment to be issued out of the circuit court and served upon Campman, the garnishee defendant. The garnishee defendant disclosed that he was not indebted to Vandermeiden for the construction of a cement sidewalk, but was indebted for the same to the Grand Haven Cement Company. Following the disclosure both the Grand Haven Cement Company and the garnishee defendant filed motions to dismiss the garnishee proceeding, but both of these motions were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Farwell v. ChambersMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Clay Lumber Co. v. Hart's Branch Coal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Solomon v. WeinerMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Barton v. Thompson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1923