Legal Opinion

Rossel v. Miller

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2001No. 00-42PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] This appeal presents a dispute between siblings. Karl Rossel sought imposition of a constructive trust and an accounting for real and personal property he contends was converted by his sister, Irmtrud Miller, and her husband, Eric Miller. He also sought a judgment for $25,000, an amount he claimed was a debt owed by the Millers. The trial court imposed a partial constructive trust for Mr. Rossel on fifty-two and a half acres of the real property and awarded the Millers five acres described as the homestead plot. The complaint was dismissed with prejudice as it related to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Hopper v. All Pet Animal Clinic, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Thomasi v. KochWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Wantulok v. WantulokWyoming Supreme Court · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Ayres and Baker Pole and Post, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Delores M. Statzer v. Lonnie D. StatzerWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Keever v. Payless Auto Sales, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Baker v. Ayres & Baker Pole & Post, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dev-Tech Corporation v. Wilson, Miller, Barton Peek, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API