Legal Opinion

Neustadt v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Submission of a controversy upon an agreed statement of facts pursuant to section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

1Opinion of the Court

Hotchkiss, J.:

Prior to October 26, 1910, the Cambridge Milling Company shipped from Cambridge, Minn., to New York, via the defend*669ant railroad company, a carload consisting of 350 sacks of flour, consigned to order, with instructions to notify plaintiffs on arrival. The flour arrived at the railroad’s Jersey City terminal on September twenty-seventh and plaintiffs were duly notified. Shortly prior to September twenty-seventh plaintiffs ordered 210 sacks to Martin’s siding, at Jersey City, and paid accrued freight charges on the entire 350 sacks. On October nineteenth the railroad company…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. Russell Manufacturing Co. v. New Haven Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Cass v. . HigenbotamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Economical Garage, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API