Legal Opinion

Neal v. Whisnant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The appeal presents these questions of law: (1) Did the document the plaintiff filed on September 6, 1963, comply with the statutory requirement that the lien “shall be filed in detail, specifying the materials furnished or the labor performed, and the time thereof?” G.S. 44-38. (2) If the claim was invalid because of the failure to give the required details, did the amendment filed October 5, 1963, giving the details, cure the defect, amend and relate back to the September claim?

The questions of law raised in the preceding paragraph are material and arise on this record. The contract was for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Cook v. . CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. King v. . ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. G. W. Jefferson & Bros. v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Wray v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shirah Contracting Co. v. WaiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Contract Steel Sales, Inc. v. Freedom Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API