Legal Opinion

Winchester & Partridge Manufacturing Co. v. Creary

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 21, 1885PublishedCited by 26 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. This suit was brought by plaintiff in error as plaintiff below against an officer who. had seized, on a writ of attachment against Hayner & Co., property sold and delivered by them to plaintiff. The facts which make the case are stated .in the. opinion of the court. Judgment below for defendant. Plaintiff .sued out this writ of error to review it.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

The Winchester and Partridge Manufacturing Company, a Wisconsin corporation, brought this action to recover damages for the seizure and sale under an attachment suéd put, on the 30th day of March, 1882, by J. É. Hayner & Co., against the property of John A. Webb & Co., of certain goods, wares, and merchandise, constituting a stock in trade; of which property* the plaintiff claims to have been, at the time the attachment was issued and levied, the owner by purchase from the defendants in the attachment suit. The seizure and sale were made by direction of Hayner &. Co., who, prior to the levy,…

2Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sonnentheil v. Christian Moerlein Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  3. Ellis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  5. Ruckman v. CorySupreme Court of the United States · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API