Munzer v. Blaisdell
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.
Motion by defendant Blaisdell to dismiss plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint, or, in the alternative, to strike out certain of its allegations.
*774The first cause of action seeks to recover upon a liability created by statute. It alleges, in substance, that Blaisdell, Medical Superintendent of Bockland State Hospital, an institution for the care and treatment of the mentally ill, violated a duty imposed upon him by statute when, by letter of December 24, 1938, addressed to defendant Carp, he enclosed plaintiff’s ^ case record while a patient at the institution.
Section 84 of the Mental Hygiene…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Amberg v. . KinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Steinberg v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- Kujek v. . GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Racine v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Doe v. RoeNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Berry v. MoenchUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Scolavino v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1946
- Westphal v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1948
- Davis v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.