Legal Opinion

Heiser v. Rhodes

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 27, 1969No. Civ. No. 7259PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hogan, District Judge.

On September 18, 1969, the defendants, who include the election officials of the state of Ohio, rejected the candidacy of the plaintiff for the office of member of the state board of education from the First Ohio District on the ground that he was not a qualified voter residing in the territory comprising the First District.

This action was promptly filed by the plaintiff in two capacities, the one being as a qualified elector of the state and the other being as a potentional candidate. The relief sought by the plaintiff includes the following:

“(a) The declaration that R.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Harper v. Virginia Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. MahanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1979
  2. Snyder v. SwannDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
  3. Vandross v. EllisorDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1972
  4. Kirkley v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. Taggart v. MandelDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API