Legal Opinion

Chevaldina v. Katz

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided June 13, 2021No. 1:21-cv-21363Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 21-CIV-21363-RAR IRINA CHEVALDINA, Plaintiff, v. RAANAN KATZ, et al., Defendants. _______________________________/ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s pro se “Motion to Vacate Order D.E. 9” [ECF No. 11] (“Motion”). Having reviewed the Motion, pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is DENIED as set forth herein. BACKGROUND A. The Parties…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tannenbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Goforth v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Crowley Cutlery Company v. United States of America and Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Fernando Fernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API