Zink v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Hall, J. cited, as to the amendment: Com. v. Foynes, 126 Mass., 267; State v. Squire, 10 N. H., 558; Mentor v. People, 30 Mich., 91. cited, on the ■ same point: State v. Washington, 15 Rich. [S. Car.], 39 ; Bishop, Crim. Proc., sec. 714; State v. Weave, 38 N. H., 314; State v. Rowley, 12 Conn., 101, 106.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, J.
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court <of Lancaster county'on the charge of embezzlement as an attorney at law, and seeks a reversal of said judgment on account of alleged errors, of which it is necessary to notice but one.
From the records of the case it appears that the accused was arraigned on the 18th day of April, 1891, and entered a plea of not guilty to the information, and the trial thereof set for the 27th of the same month. On the last named day the case was called for trial, when the county attorney in behalf of the state asked, and over the objection of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kibs v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- McNair v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
- People v. TryonMichigan Supreme Court · 1857
3Cited by4 opinions
- McKay v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Barker v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Duggan v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
- Rice v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1944