Legal Opinion

Riegel & Co. v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1929No. Appeal, 331PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

The thirty-six inch express water main of the City of Philadelphia laid by it under the surface of Seventh Street burst about three o’clock in the morning of September 3,1926, and poured great quantities of water into the cellar of a building occupied by plaintiff, damaging a stock of paper goods which it had stored therein. This action was brought to recover compensation for the loss and resulted in a verdict in its favor for $17,128.79, upon which judgment was entered. Defendant thereupon took this appeal, contending that plaintiff has not shown a state of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heh v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Kibele v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  3. Hartman v. Citizens Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  4. Rumsey v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Zimmer v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yearsley v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hindes v. PittsburghSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API