Legal Opinion

Chronerberry v. Bartel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1940No. 394PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By BARNES, J.

The above entitled cause is now being determined as an error proceeding from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Miami County, Ohio.

Plaintiff’s cause of action, as disclosed by his petition, was for work, labor, office work and general care and nursing rendered August Bartel, now deceased, at his special instance and request, for a period of 363 days, at $5.00 per day, commencing January 9, 1934, to January 7, 1935, both inclusive, aggregating the sum of $1815.00, against which a credit of $385.00 was allowed, leaving a claimed amount due of $1430.00.

The petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Titus v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Lindsay v. HoganMontana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. ChurchillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of DouglassPreble County Probate Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API