Legal Opinion

Bottorff v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 29, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2018-3122Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL FISSLER, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 18-3122 (CKK) ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION1 This case is one of many in this jurisdiction arising from terrorist attacks on coalition soldiers during the American invasion and occupation of Iraq. Plaintiffs are surviving U.S. servicemembers and heirs who seek to hold Iran responsible for the role it allegedly played in a number of these attacks. They have sued the Islamic Republic of Iran (“Iran”) under the terrorism exception to the Foreign…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of NigeriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Saudi Arabia v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  4. Mwani, Odilla Mutaka v. Bin Ladin, UsamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API