Farrar v. Farrar

— I. The plaintiff and defendant were married in 1880. The first action was commenced by the plaintiff in 1883, and is for a divorce and custody of a son, then about two years old. There is some evidence tending to show that a decree was granted in said action, but it never was entered of record, and if it had been there are doubts whether it would have been valid. The plaintiff, however, believed she was divorced, and went to Montana, where she married one Rogers, who has since deceased. She returned to this state in 1886, and. brought her son with her. In 1886 the second action (of habeas…