Legal Opinion
Moufang v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 17, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThacher, J.
The Appellate Division, third department, has affirmed an order of the Court of Claims granting respondents’ motion for leave to file a claim against the State, and the appeal is here upon the following certified question: “ Does the proposed claim of the respondents state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action 1 ”
The claim is for damages for failure to invest and keep invested moneys paid into court pursuant to a final decree of the Supreme Court, County of Kings, which was entered February 7,1894, in a partition action brought by Harry C. Hallenbeck and Elizabeth C. Hallenbeck,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Livingston v. . LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Gilman v. . TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Provident Institution for Savings v. MaloneSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- In re the Accounting of DallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Bienstock v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1955
- De Soye v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965