Legal Opinion

Dickinson v. Mankin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Raleigh County. Action by Johfl Q. Dickinson against Crocket Mankin and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

John Q. Dickinson brought an action of trespass guare clausum fregit against Crocket Mankin and P. S. Burk-holder to recover damages for. entering upon a tract of land claimed by Dickinson and cutting timber thereon. The defendants xileaded two pleas, one not guilty, the other lilernux tenementum. A trial before a jury was had resulting in a verdict for the defendants, on which judgment was rendered for them, and Dickinson brings the case to this Court.

The defendants challenge the jurisdiction of this Court to entertain the writ of error. They claim that this suit is one for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fort Dearborn Lodge No. 214 v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Barrett v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Greathouse v. SappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Marion Machine Works v. CraigWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Cook v. DaughertySupreme Court of Virginia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bluefield v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Hoffman v. ShoemakerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lawson v. HersmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Lohr v. WolfeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Rose v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API