Legal Opinion

Fairbanks, Morse Company v. Parker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 6, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). We think the decision of the circuit court was wrong. There is no showing in the record that appellees claimed the property adversely to the rights of appellant, or that the latter waived his. right to retake the property, under his contract, for failure to pay the purchase money. The contract in each case was in writing, and in express terms stated that the title to the propérty should remain in the seller until it was paid for. The fact that the original purchaser sold the engines did not give the second purchaser any greater rights than the original…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Triplett v. Mansur & Tebbetts Implement Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  2. Sunny South Lumber Co. v. Neimeyer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  3. Clinton v. RossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. Estes v. Lamb & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Nattin v. RileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kolb v. Golden Rule Baking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Loden v. Paris Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  3. Simmons National Bank v. DaltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Meyer v. Equitable Credit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  5. Cloud Oak Flooring Co. v. J. A. Riggs Tractor Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API