Legal Opinion

Karsch v. Pottier & Stymus Mfg. & Imp. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Action by George Karsch against the Pottier & Stymus Manufacturing & Improvement Company. From an order granting a motion to set aside the verdict for the reasons specified in Code Civ. Proc. § 999, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.

The complaint avers that the defendant is a domestic corporation; that on the ioth day of August, 1897, William H. Paulding made his certain promissory note in writing, whereby he promised to. pay to the order of the defendant, three months after date, the sum of $7,500, with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent., and delivered said note to the defendant; that thereafter, and before maturity, the defendant duly indorsed said note, and delivered the same for value, and it came into the possession of the plaintiff for value before maturity ; that when the said note became due and payable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cheever v. Pittsburgh, Shenango & Lake Erie RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. People's Bank v. St. Anthony's Roman Catholic ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Patterson v. . RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Hess v. W. & J. SloaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greene v. Iroquois Hotel & Apartment Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
  2. In re Annin & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  3. Abraham Arndt & Bros. v. New York Fruit Water Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API