Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Rosenthal Jewelers Supply Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 7, 1990No. 88-2074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of the trial court’s order of dismissal in this personal injury action, entered as a sanction for failure to comply with discovery. We affirm; however, we remand to the trial court with directions.

The action was initiated by the Hammers based on the allegation that Mr. Hammer, a jeweler, allegedly contracted mesothelio-ma, a form of lung cancer, due to prolonged occupational exposure to asbestos dust from products manufactured by appel-lees. Mr. Hammer died, allegedly from mesothelioma, shortly after filing his complaint.

An emergency motion to enjoin burial and compel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Esgro v. TrezzaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gottlieb v. SamiianDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API