Legal Opinion

Doran v. Thomsen

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 9, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On motion to amend declaration.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

The original declaration in this action contained three counts.

This court, in an opinion reported in 45 Vroom 445, sustained a demurrer to the first and third counts, hut allowed the second count to stand.

The plaintiff then went to trial and obtained a judgment against the defendant, which, in an opinion in the Court of Errors and Appeals reported in 47 Vroom 754, was reversed and a new trial awarded.

The plaintiff now moves to amend his declaration.

As it now stands the declaration charges in substance that the defendant was possessed of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doran v. ThomsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  2. Lower v. SegalSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  3. Frelinghuysen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Welsh v. Bd. of Ed. of Tewksbury Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. Dalby v. Shannon & FlorenceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Williams v. William B. Scaife & Sons Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
  4. Scott v. GarberNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. Cafone v. Nesto Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API