Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Provident Life & Accident Ins.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1934No. 31274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Appellant’s decedent was engaged, at the time of his death, in the business of moving small houses, for which purpose he was using a vehicular contrivance which, for want of a better name, we may call a trailer. It consisted of six strong wheels operating upon large axles, and the device was of such character that a small house could be loaded upon it, and the house could be moved along the public highways by attaching two tractors as the motive power. While operating this contrivance with a house loaded upon it, appellant’s decedent was run over by the trailer and was killed. The accident…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Neighbors v. Life Casualty Ins. Co. of TennesseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Hart v. North American Acc. Ins.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McFarland v. Utica Fire Insurance Co. of Oneida County, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
  2. Continental Cas. Co. v. HesterMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Minnesota Life Insurance Co. v. Columbia Casualty Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2014
  4. FRANK GARDNER HDWE. AND SUPPLY CO. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Red Panther Chemical Company, a Corporation v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API