Legal Opinion

Clearfield County v. Cameron Tp. Poor D.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 1890No. 71PublishedCited by 9 opinions

.APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONS OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. No. 71 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given.

Read the full summary

.APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF QUARTER SESSIONS OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY. No. 71 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, number and term not given. On April 26, 1889, a ease stated was filed, between the commissioners of Clearfield .county and the overseers of the poor of Cameron township, Northumberland county, wherein it was agreed in substance: That Cameron township, county of Northumberland, was a separate poor district; that for at least four years prior to Fel> ruary, 1880, one Nicholas Miller had a legal settlement therein; that at that time he came into Clearfield county in…

1Per curiam

The learned judge below has said all that is necessary to say in this case.

Order affirmed.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. EarleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. AldermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Walters v. McKinnisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Montour County v. Directors of Poor of Danville & Mahoning Poor DistrictSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API