In re the Estate of Browning
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Delehanty, S.
In this discovery proceeding the individual respondent concededly dominates and controls the corporate respondent which concededly collected $541.55 representing commissions paid to it by insurance companies for placing insurance on real property owned by deceased individually.
The proof shows that after deceased died on October 12, 1934, ithe individual respondent terminated the services of the insurance representative of deceased. Shortly thereafter the individual *108respondent canceled policies of fire insurance in large amounts at short rates, thus causing a substantial loss…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lamdin v. Broadway Surface Advertising Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- White v. ShermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- In re the Estate of BrowningNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- In re the Final Accounting of HiltzikNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- P. H. Carlyon, Inc. v. Roberts, New York County Courts1946
- In re Title Guarantee & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940