Legal Opinion

Murrison v. Fenstermacher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1949No. 37,409PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This action involves a real estate contract and was brought for the purpose of requiring defendant to furnish plaintiff with a merchantable title and thus specifically perform the terms of such agreement. The trial court held the title theretofore tendered plaintiff was merchantable and rendered judgment directing him to pay defendant the balance of the purchase price upon delivery of the abstract title and a warranty deed to the real estate. Plaintiff appeals from that judgment.

The pleadings are not in controversy and it therefore suffices…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Groesbeck v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Case v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Dingey v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Baker v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
  5. Buty v. GoldfinchWashington Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Van Slooten v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Williams v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  4. Peterson v. MoultonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1958
  5. Kupka v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API