Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scheinin v. Scheinin

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 12, 1952No. [No. 182, October Term, 1951.]Published

1Dissent

Markell, J.,

delivered the following dissenting opinion.

I dissent from the decision and the opinion because (1) the evidence does not show that either party is entitled to a divorce and (2) the opinion is a departure from the decisions of this court by an extension of the scope of both (a) cruelty (apparently not a basis of the decision and therefore not a necessary or relevant subject of discussion) and (b) constructive desertion, as grounds for divorce.

If we assume that the circumstances attending the move by the husband and his secretary to the triangular husband-secretary-wife home, two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fleegle v. FleegleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  2. Schriver v. SchriverCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  3. Collins v. CollinssCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  4. Maranto v. MarantoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Meeks v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API