Legal Opinion

Edmond Weil, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 9, 1944No. Docket Nos. 1773, 2690Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Edmond Weil, Inc. v. Commissioner.

Edmond Weil, Inc. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 1773, 2690.

United States Tax Court

1944 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 143; 3 T.C.M. (CCH) 844; T.C.M. (RIA) 44271;

August 9, 1944

Nathan Immerman, Esq., 233 Broadway, New York, N. Y., for the petitioner. Arthur Groman, Esq., for the respondent.

DISNEY

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

DISNEY, Judge: The petitions herein were filed for the purpose of redetermining the following deficiencies:

Declared

Value

Excess

Docket

Income

Profits

Year

No.

Tax

Tax

1939

1773

$2,967.59

$105.38

1940

2690

3,494.93

106.57

The Commissioner, in the deficiency…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Higgins v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. T. T. Word Supply Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  4. Perkins v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  5. Credit & Inv. Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API