Legal Opinion

Swift & Co. v. Russell

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1899No. 1,234PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the United States Court of Appeals in the Indian Territory.

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

In an action in the United States court in the Indian Territory which the plaintiff in error, Swift & Co., a corporation, had brought against one Guy, and in which the plaintiff had caused a writ of attachment to be levied upon certain property, the defendant in error, G. S. Russell, filed an interplea, in which he claimed the attached property as its owner. The plaintiff denied his claim, and at the trial of the issue between the plaintiff and the interpleader the court permitted the latter to prove and to recover a judgment for the value of the attached property which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fly v. Grieb's AdministratorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  2. Jefferson v. DunavantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank of Newkirk v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Hughes Bros. Mfg. Co. v. ReaganCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1902
  3. Johnson v. MasonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API