Legal Opinion

St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Cottonwood county, where the action was tried by Perkins, J. The lands, involved comprise that part of the plaintiff’s land grant embraced rathe “Drake & Wilder trust,” created by a conveyance from plaintiff to Elias F. Drake and Amherst H. Wilder, trustees, bearing date July 30, 1879, in trust to secure certain “special stock.”

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The question presented on this appeal is whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction restraining the defendants, county officers, from proceeding to enforce the levy and collection of' taxes upon the lands described in the complaint, and included in the-*395trust deed to Drake & Wilder, annexed thereto. It is alleged in the complaint that the defendant, county auditor, caused all the lands in question to be placed upon the assessment-roll for the year 1887 previous, and threatens to cause the same to be extended upon the tax duplicate for that year, and to cause the various taxes for state…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grandin v. Le Roy & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Stout v. CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Dearth v. Hide & Leather National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newton v. NewtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Rivers v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Albrecht v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. ScheiberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Crump v. IngersollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API