STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent v. DONALD K. HARDY
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDon E. Burrell, P.J.
—OPINION AUTHOR
Donald K. Hardy (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. See section 195.211. 1 His sole point on appeal claims the search warrant that authorized officials to search his home and surrounding vehicles was constitutionally deficient because it did not describe the place to be searched with sufficient particularity. Finding no merit in this claim, we affirm.
Standard of Review and Applicable Law
We review a trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress to determine whether it was supported by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Christopher GitchoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- State v. PikeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- State v. SundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- United States v. Wesley Allen DorroughCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Eric KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Robin L. Schmidt v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. JAMES CHRISTOPHER BALES, Defendant-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020