Legal Opinion

Strauss v. Phenix Insurance

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of La Plata County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, J.

Shields & Bunger were indebted to Strauss & Co. for goods sold and delivered, and the vendors brought suit in the county court of- La Plata county to collect their claim. It was put into judgment, and, by the proceedings which we are asked to review, Strauss & Co. sought to compel the appellee, the Phenix Insurance Company, to pay a loss covered by a policy which the Insurance Company had issued. The general facts out of which the liability is said to arise are not disputed. The judgment is not assailed, and the right of Strauss & Co. to enforce their claim against the Insurance Company is…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Wood v. . American Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Phenix Insurance v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Renier v. Dwelling House InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Grant v. VarneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1895

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchants' Mutual Fire Insurance v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  2. Murphy v. GumaerColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Murphy v. GumaerColorado Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API