Legal Opinion

Genaro v. Hosmer

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 14, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract. The cause of action is the alleged breach of a covenant in an assignment given by the defendants to the plaintiff. There were two hearings before the same judge of the Superior Court, who made findings and rulings. The evidence is not reported in full and the bill of exceptions does not purport to contain a summary of it all; therefore the findings of fact must be accepted as true. The pertinent facts thus displayed are that at the time of the assignment, June 1, 1922, the defendants (hereafter called the Hosmers) were plaintiffs in an action pending in a court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Lunt v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. New York Central Railroad Co. v. William Culkeen & Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Keljikian v. Star Brewing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Craig v. HarrahNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Swaim v. RedeenMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Buhl v. VieraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  5. Levinton v. PoorvuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API