Grimm v. Columbus Savings Bank Co.

“This ease, begun by the receiver to recover for the benefit of eheckholders and general creditors the amount of his company’s general deposit, is now before the court upon a demurrer to the answer of the defendant bank. The facts as presented by the answer are as follows; that the plaintiff was appointed receiver of the Columbus Pump Supply Company on April 25, 1922, at which time it had on deposit with the defendant bank the sum of $1,178.61, and was indebted to said bank on its note for $3,800, which was not due until June 13, 1922; that for a considerable time prior to April 25th the…