Legal Opinion

Southall v. Quam

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1938No. File No. 6479Published

1Opinion of the Court

Pejr Curiam.

Action in claim and delivery to recover possession of a Horse sold by one Martin Mickelson to tbe defendant. Plaintiff claims title under the contract involved in the case of Southall v. Mickelson, just decided by this court, ante, 191, 277 N. W. 601. Upon the trial in District Court the two cases were consolidated but separate judgments were entered. The animal in this case is involved in the accounting action of Southall v. Mickelson, and, since it was there held that Mr. Mickelson was the owner of the horses described, the decision in that case is decisive of this.

Judgment of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southall v. MickelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API