Legal Opinion
Shea v. Paczowski
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 9, 1987No. 5125PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.
The defendants are appealing from the decision of the trial court setting aside the jury verdict as inadequate and ordering a new trial unless the defendants filed an additur with the court.
In this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident, the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the amount of $1640. The trial court, upon motion of the plaintiff, set aside the verdict as inadequate and ordered a new trial on the issue of damages only, unless the defendants filed with the court an additur in the amount of $7060. Although the trial court, in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Kiniry v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Josephson v. MeyersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Creem v. CiceroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Hunte v. Amica Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Trumpold v. BeschConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Brennan v. ManlapazConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Rogers v. DelfinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.