Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dasha Ex Rel. Dasha v. Maine Medical Center

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 4, 1995Published

1DissentLipez, Justice

Historically, the courts have used equitable principles to ameliorate the harshness of the law. We cannot ameliorate such harshness in direct contravention of a statute, such as 14 M.R.S.A. § 853 (setting forth the limited circumstances that justify tolling a statute of limitations). See Inhabitants of the Town of Beals v. Beal, 149 Me. 19, 98 A.2d 552, 555 (1953). We can, however, apply equitable principles to prevent a defendant from using fraudulent conduct, or the equivalent thereof, to invoke a statutory defense in a manner so unjust that the Legislature could not have intended the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Pino v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  4. Townsend v. AppelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Hanusek v. Southern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API