Legal Opinion

Lopez v. Medina

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 22, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUMMIS, J.S.C.

I. Introduction

These cases are summary dispossess actions returnable December 3,1992. Defendants and tenants Miguel Medina (“Medina”) and Rafael Martinez (“Martinez”) have brought this motion pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:18-60 and R. 6:4-1(g) to transfer these actions from the Special Civil Part to the Law Division of the Superior Court, and for consolidation.

*115II. Facts

Medina and Martinez are tenants of the premises owned by Dario Lopez (“plaintiff”). There are no written leases; Medina and Martinez are under oral periodic tenancies (month-to-month). Both defendants speak little…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Carteret Properties v. Variety Donuts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  2. Randell v. Newark Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Carr v. JohnsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  4. Levy v. MacySupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Morrocco v. FeltonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Family Kingdom, Inc. v. EMIF New Jersey Ltd. Partnership (In Re Family Kingdom, Inc.)District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  2. THE VILLAGE APARTMENTS VS. DAVID MACALL (LT-008654-19, CAMDEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API