Legal Opinion

Pickert v. Canal Boat Independence

New York District Court

Decided March 15, 1878PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlatchford, J.

On the evidence I am of opinion that there is a considerable sum of money still due to E. Remington & Sons on the mortgage, and that the notes given to them in March, 1874, were not given in settlement or discharge of the mortgage. Prima facie, the claimants are entitled to retain possession of the canal boat under the mortgage.

The provisions of the act of April 28,1864 (Laws of New York of 1864, p. 993) in regard to filing in the office of the *206auditor of the canal department a mortgage on a canal boat- and refiling in the same office a copy thereof with a statement of interest within thirty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson ex dem. Merrick v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Hill v. . BeebeNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  3. Newell v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1870

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Garrison v. MarieNew York Supreme Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API