Legal Opinion

Jones v. Isaacson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 20, 1952No. 13570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This was a motion for leave to make new proof by taking the depositions of certain named witnesses for use on this appeal pursuant to the rules of this Court relating to appeals in admiralty.

It appears from the application that on the trial below these witnesses were called by the party now making this motion and objections to questions propounded to them were sustained by the trial court. It is said that upon such refusal to allow the witnesses to. testify the court also refused to allow the testimony to be taken by the court reporter pursuant to Rule 46B of the Admiralty Rules, 28 U.S.C.A.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petterson Lighterage & T. Corp. v. New York Central R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Hutchinson v. DickieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  3. Johnson v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. American & Cuban S. S. Line, Inc. v. Beer, Sondheimer & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  5. United States v. Apex Fish Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. James P. Staples, Bernard D. Oslin, Richard C. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. Petrich v. Hansen the St. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API