Legal Opinion

Fraizer v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. Civ. 4-85-144PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Dov Fraizer, a Danish citizen, and Britt Bolesen, his wife, brought this action against St. Jude Medical Inc. (St. Jude), a Minnesota corporation, alleging negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty and loss of consortium and seeking compensatory damages. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The matter is now before the court upon St. Jude’s motion to dismiss for forum non conveniens.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Fraizer had a mitral valve prosthesis surgically implanted by Danish doctors in a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Hague v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Dahl v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ledingham v. Parke-Davis Division of Warner-Lambert Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1986
  3. Dunn v. A/S EM. Z. SVITZERDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API