Legal Opinion
Cajun Global LLC v. Swati Enters., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 13, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION FILE NO.: 1:17–CV–04504–TWTPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the expiration of the Franchise Agreement in May 2017, Defendant Rahman re-branded the Franchised Restaurant as "Orange Fried Chicken," a similar quick-service restaurant specializing in the sale fried chicken. Orange Fried Chicken also uses a logo, marks and other décor that are confusingly similar to the Church's Chicken logo and Marks. Thereafter, Plaintiffs demanded that Defendants cease and desist the use of confusingly similar marks at the former Franchised Restaurant. Plaintiffs also demanded that Defendants cease and desist operating *1329Orange Fried Chicken, which Plaintiffs claim…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McDonald's Corp. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Conagra, Inc., a Corporation v. Robert C. Singleton, an Individual, D/B/A Singleton Shrimp Boats, Singleton Shrimp Boats, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. Evapco, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- ConSeal International Incorporated v. Neogen CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- ConSeal International Incorporated v. Neogen CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Peterson v. Evapco, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Stars Union Equipment Technology (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. v. Tru-Stone SPC Inc., f/k/a ROKPlank Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.