Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Couch, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1985No. 83-1027, 83-1028Published

1Opinion of the Court

BEATTY, Justice.

Appeals by defendants, Harrington Construction Corporation (Harrington) and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (USF & G), from judgments for the plaintiff, Couch, Inc., in the plaintiff’s action brought to recover money damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees under a payment bond. We reverse and remand.

On October 16, 1981, Harrington entered into a contract with the City of Samson, Alabama, under which Harrington was engaged to make certain sewer improvements. On that same date, Harrington contracted with USF & G for a surety bond to insure payment on the project. This…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. WestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Globe Indemnity Co. v. BarnesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. American Casualty Company of Reading, Pa. v. DevineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Young & Vann Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Guaranteed Gravel & Sand Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API