Stejskal v. Simons
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. The evidence unequivocally demonstrated that the sole purpose of the construction work was to convert what was a multiple dwelling into a one-family dwelling for the owners’ use. Thus, defendant owners were entitled to avail themselves of the one- or two-family homeowner’s exemption provided in Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (see Khela v Neiger, 85 NY2d 333, 338 [1995]; Cannon v Putnam, 76 NY2d 644, 650 [1990]).
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cannon v. PutnamNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Khela v. NeigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ortega v. PucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Ferrero v. Best Modular Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Caiazzo v. Mark Joseph Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Thompson v. GeniesseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Nicholas v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.