Legal Opinion

Schramm v. Irvin

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided April 2, 1998No. 1:97-cv-00252PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this petition for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the following reasons, the petition is denied.

BACKGROUND

On December 1, 1987, petitioner was indicted by an Erie County Grand Jury for Murder in the Second Degree under N.Y. Penal Law § 125.25(1), 1 Assault in the First Degree under N.Y. Penal Law § 120.10(1), 2 and Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Third Degree under N.Y. Penal Law §…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Martin H. Tankleff v. D.A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ellis v. WilkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API