Legal Opinion

City of Fayetteville v. Stanberry

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1991No. 91-34PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

This case comes to us from an inverse condemnation judgment against the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas. The City has appealed, challenging instructions to the jury and an award of prejudgment interest.

The dispute stems from the construction of a 24” sewer line on lands of Earnest and Carol Stanberry, appellees. The City obtained an easement from the Stanberrys in 1968. After construction of the line, raw sewage overflowed on appellees’ property. The overflows began in 1969 and continued periodically until the time of trial, with one particularly severe overflow in March…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Robinson v. City of AshdownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  4. Shellnut v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
  5. Lovell v. Marianna Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stein v. LukasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Wheeler Motor Co., Inc. v. RothSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Woodline Motor Freight, Inc. v. Troutman Oil Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. National By-Products, Inc. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Kutait v. O'RoarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API