Crochet v. Charles Holston, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
|.SAUNDERS, J.
Defendants assert that the only issues to be addressed at the trial of this matter are the alleged failure to pay medical bills and medical mileage. Therefore, they applied for supervisory writ to review the judgment on their exception of prescription in an attempt to avoid the expense and delay of a trial on the matter. We granted supervisory writs to review the workers’ compensation court’s denial of defendants’ exception of prescription with respect to unpaid medical bills. We affirm the ruling of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (“WCJ”).
FACTS
The facts in this matter appear to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Lima v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Barrilleaux v. NPC, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Boquet v. Tetra Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Bellard v. Grey Wolf DrillingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ahmed v. Home DepotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Dave Neal v. Town of WelshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Neal v. TOWN OF WELSHLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sandra Ahmed v. Home DepotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012