Legal Opinion

Ratcliffe v. Coastal Resources Management Counsel

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 3, 1991No. 88-291-M.PPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KELLEHER, Justice.

This fifteen-year-old controversy comes before us pursuant to three separate petitions for certiorari. The three petitions arise from a dispute between J. Richard and Edith Ratcliffe (the Ratcliffes) and the Coastal Resources Management Council (CRMC). Prior to examining the legal issues before us, a recitation of the facts is in order. We shall address each of the three petitions as it arises in our narration of the facts.

In 1975 the Ratcliffes became owners-in-fee of a parcel of land situated in the town of Little Compton. The parcel is bounded on the west by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. East Greenwich Yacht Club v. Coastal Resources Management CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Matunuck Beach Hotel, Inc. v. SheldonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. Sakonnet Rogers, Inc. v. Coastal Resources Management CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  4. Easton's Point Ass'n v. Coastal Resources Management CouncilSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  5. Barletta v. KilvertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Planned Environments Management Corp. v. RobertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. Arnold v. LebelSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  3. Providence Water Supply Board v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  4. United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  5. Henry Tarbox v. Zoning Board of Review of the Town of JamestownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API