Legal Opinion

Blakeney v. Dee

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 21, 1977No. Civ. 1300PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Presiding Judge.

This case began with the filing of an action of interpleader by the payor of a note to determine which of two claimants were due to be paid the sum interpleaded.

The matter was submitted to the court for judgment upon stipulation of facts. The issue was whether priority was to be determined by the Uniform Commercial Code or by pre-UCC statute. The trial court ruled that pre-UCC law was to be applied and that claimant Dee had priority. We affirm.

The facts are: On November 23, 1960, Warrior Acres, Inc., the interpleader here, executed a note payable to Marion Weston in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Van Winkle & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Pappas v. City of EufaulaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Howell v. CardenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. CopleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
  5. August v. PoznanskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blakeney v. DeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API