Legal Opinion

Parrish v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 11, 1962No. 48882PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSER, Commissioner.

This is a suit to quiet title (Section 527.-150, RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.) in which plaintiff seeks equitable relief. The circuit court dismissed plaintiff’s petition at the close of her case and she has appealed.

We have jurisdiction because this appeal involves the title to real estate within the meaning of Constitution of 1945, Art. 5, § 3, V.A.M.S.

Respondents filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 83.05, V.A.M.R. We have determined that the case should be decided on the merits. Accordingly, notwithstanding appellant’s brief is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Donovan v. BoeckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. Bobb v. WolffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Cobb v. DaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  5. Curd v. ReabanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Webb v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Wile v. DonovanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Abberton v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Atlas Motor Inns, Inc. v. All American Holding Corp. (In re All American Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1981
  5. Charlene C. Bradford v. Josh TerryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API