Legal Opinion
State of Texas and City of Austin v. Munday Enterprises, Texas Commerce Bank-Austin, N.A. & First City National Bank of Austin, F/K/A City National Bank of Austin
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
Decided March 11, 1992No. 03-90-00236-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Munday2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,
AT AUSTIN
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NO. 3-90-236-CV
STATE OF TEXAS AND CITY OF AUSTIN,
APPELLANTS
vs.
MUNDAY ENTERPRISES, TEXAS COMMERCE BANK-AUSTIN, N.A.
AND FIRST CITY NATIONAL BANK OF AUSTIN, f/k/a
CITY NATIONAL BANK OF AUSTIN,
APPELLEES
FROM THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY
NO. 1682, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING
On motion for rehearing, the State argues that our original opinion erred in holding that Munday was entitled to introduce evidence at trial on loss of access, visibility, and highway construction activity, not as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. Wood Oil Distributing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Waco v. Texland CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Pennysavers Oil Co. of Texas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
- City of Beaumont v. MarksTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- City of San Antonio v. OlivaresTexas Supreme Court · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.